Lago wrote:What's the minimum amount of power/effort/handwaving you need to do to make it so that we never have to worry about a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan ever again?
India annexing Pakistan. I'm not even kidding. Did you hear about how the Sri Lankan Cricket Team had to b helicopter evaced out of Pakistan because their bus caravan was attacked by Fejadin? Just like the Mumbai attack, but they didn't have to leave the country to do it because some foreigners came to them. And now no one will play cricket against Pakistan in Pakistan siting security concerns.
IGTN wrote:Is this sensationalised, or do many doctors actually have this problem?
Completely sensationalized. As some people noted, her statistics are way off and there actually are reasons to give pap smears to people who have had hysterectomies. But the big thing is that medicine
is science. And it advances faster than anyone can keep track of. Pub Med reports that there were 6898 medical papers published
yesterday. And yesterday isn't even over in Hawaii as I type this.
So if you look at any particular piece of research and then look out to see if there are doctors who aren't following the evidence based medicine that it suggests - the answer is yes. Even if research didn't contradict itself in many cases with different similar studies producing what appear to be opposite results, the fact remains that with literally thousands of papers published
daily there is absolutely no way whatsoever for
any doctor to stay abreast of what exactly the latest science
is.
We read a lot, and we study hard, and we stay as modern and as well versed in the statistics of medicine - much more so than Begley who is literally just a crank author on the internet who pulled a rant topic out of a hat. But a good portion of it is art. Sorry, but it's true. Doctors eventually have to get into a routine and do things as best as they know how rather than constantly reading and comparing scientific literature. Medicine moves forward with incredible speed, but actually changing any particular practice is rather difficult. And deliberately so, considering how easy it is for one study or another to get an anomalous result and how frequently new procedures contain unforseen risks.
-Username17